[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [LTP] crash tests
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:32:19AM +0200, Stephane Fillod wrote:
> * mem01
> Tries to malloc as much memory as possible, and make pages dirty
> to force RAM allocation. In other words, this is a memory stress test.
> Makes linux-2.4.2-ac20+am_console_patch+ng_lowlatency panic..
> * proc01
> Reads all the readable files in /proc. Good to exercise read locks,
> and good kernel latency killer too. Let me know if it blocks on read
> (shouldn't). Also "cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/flush" returns EINVAL
> on read, is it the expected behaviour?
> * crash01
> This one comes from the world famous 'crashme-2.4', written
> by George J Carrette. Actually, a lot of code has been rewritten,
> but credits are due.
Delayed to verify the license from the original author.
> * crash02
> As crash01 creates random instructions and executes them, crash02
> creates random syscalls and executes them. This may be dangerous since
> it can actually erase all your data. However, on non-production system,
> with fs mounted ro and run as nobody, this could be safe (NO WARRANTY).
> After some testing, I noticed that some random syscalls are killed
> by SIGSEGV. Aren't they supposed to return nicely with EFAULT instead?
> I tried to use the ltp library, following the mmap001.c example.
It looks like you've done a good job. mem01.c doesn't seem to clean up
properly, but we can clean that up later. Shall I wait to release a new
tarball until after you've verified the license on crash01.c or do you
think that's going to take a while?
Thanks for the contribution,
Nate Straz firstname.lastname@example.org
sgi, inc http://www.sgi.com/
Linux Test Project http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ltp/